A Layered Approach to Facial Ageing in Your late 50s: Michelle's Full-Face and Neck Before and After

BY David Jack
A Layered Approach to Facial Ageing in Your late 50s: Michelle's Full-Face and Neck Before and After
SKIN JOURNEYS

Michelle came to the clinic aged 58 with several changes that had developed gradually across different areas of her face.  She had noticed changes in her face related to loss of volume through the midface, deeper folds around the mouth, reduced definition along the jawline and increasing sun damage from years of living in the sun in France. A previous fall had also affected her jaw, causing malocclusion and altering the balance of her lower face.

As a former ballerina, Michelle was particularly attuned to proportion, posture and movement.  She wanted to look fresher and more rested, with clearer skin and better facial support, while preserving her expression and the features that made her recognisably herself.

Her treatments followed a carefully planned, multi-stage approach considering her entire appearance from a holistic and multi-layered anatomical approach.  This started with deep plane dermal filler was used to restore selected areas of structural support, toxin was used to soften expression lines and reduce downward muscular pull, IPL addressed pigmentation and redness and UltraClear laser improved laxity, texture and collagen quality.

The aim, as with all of the treatments we do in clinic, was to treat the face as a connected anatomical structure.  Facial ageing affects bone, fat, muscle, ligaments and skin, so Michelle’s programme was designed to improve each relevant layer with a treatment selected for a specific purpose.

 

Michelle’s Treatment Journey: Key Facts

 

Patient

Michelle

Age at consultation

58

Background

Former ballerina

Primary concerns

Facial volume loss, sun damage, lower-face laxity and jawline changes following trauma

Relevant history

Previous fall resulting in malocclusion and altered lower-face balance

 

A Patient-Led Approach to Full-Face Rejuvenation

 

Michelle’s concerns were connected, yet each originated from a different anatomical layer.  The midface and lower face had lost structural support.  Repeated muscular movement had not only contributed to lines in the upper face and downward pull through the neck, but the deeper volume loss had caused the downward pulling muscles in the frown area, side of the eyes and neck to enhance the tissue descent already seen with the volume depletion itself.  Likewise, long term sun exposure had produced scattered pigmentation in the form of solar lentigines and redness and collagen loss had affected the texture and firmness of the skin.

Treating one feature in isolation would have left the wider ageing pattern untouched.  Her plan therefore combined several complementary treatments, introduced in stages and adjusted to her anatomy, previous trauma, skin condition and recovery schedule.

This is central to our approach in clinic.  We always begin with the patient’s face, history and priorities, then identify the underlying anatomical causes of the changes that can be seen.  Treatment is planned across the relevant tissue layers, with every intervention serving a defined purpose so the final result should look balanced, healthy and entirely believable.

What Happens to the Face in Your 50s?

 

Facial ageing develops across several layers at once.  Bone remodels, deep fat compartments lose volume, retaining ligaments become less supportive and the skin produces less collagen and elastin.  From the sun, ultraviolet (UV) exposure adds pigmentation, redness, fine lines and uneven texture. Alongside this, hormonal changes around and after menopause can further reduce hydration and dermal resilience.

These changes often become most visible through the midface and lower face. Reduced support increases shadowing around the eyes, nose and mouth with deepening grooves, fat pad descent and fine lines and wrinkles. Loss of projection at the chin and angle of the jawline softens the jawline and the pull of the platysma muscle of the neck may adds to the jowls that start to form.

Michelle showed several of these changes. She also had photodamage from sun exposure whilst previous trauma to her jaw introduced an additional asymmetry that required careful mapping.  This resulted in malocclusion which is a separate functional issue for appropriate dental or maxillofacial review; our aesthetic treatment addressed external proportion and support.

 

Why a Full-Face Assessment Matters

 

Patients often point to a nasolabial fold and say ‘this is the problem’.  Anatomically, the fold may be the final visible consequence of support being lost several centimetres away.  Filling the crease alone can make the centre of the face heavy whilst restoring selected points of deep support can soften it more convincingly and preserve natural movement.  We call this our ‘deep plane filler’ approach.

We assessed Michelle at rest, in animation and from multiple angles. Her trauma history made the relationship between the chin, jawline and midface especially important.  As a former ballerina, she also had a finely tuned awareness of posture, balance and movement so her result needed to remain coherent in motion.

 

Step One: Deep Plane Filler to Restore Facial Structure

 

The first layer of Michelle’s rejuvenation involved structural dermal filler. Our Deep Plane Filler approach restores support at deeper anatomical levels, frequently on or close to bone, using precise injections at points where age-related volume loss has altered the facial framework.

For Michelle, filler was placed through the deep midface, at the angle of the jawline and in the central chin. These areas of dermal filler injection are designed act as structural anchors to rebuild bony support where it has been lost. This improve the transition from the lower eyelid into the face and supports tissues that have begun to descend.  Treating the mandibular angles (i.e. jawline filler) helps restore the frame of the lower face indirectly. Likewise, central chin support improves the relationship between the chin, mouth and jawline, which was particularly relevant given her history of trauma.

Filler attracts water, so tissue plane matters enormously.  Indiscriminate superficial placement can create puffiness and blur natural contours whereas deep placement allows the product to function as internal scaffolding, replacing selected elements of support and preserving the patient’s identity.

Michelle also received small, targeted refinements around the nasolabial and marionette regions.  These were performed after the deeper framework had been rebuilt.  The structural injections provided the architecture, then conservative line treatment softened residual creasing around the mouth.

Across a full-face treatment, distribution, depth and product choice determine the visible effect.  Product spread across the midface, chin and jaw can remain subtle because it replaces support across a broad framework and goes no further than replacing lost volume.  Restoration of lost facial architecture is the governing principle.

 

Step Two: Toxins for Expression Lines and Neck Support

 

Anti-wrinkle botulinum toxin injections formed the muscular layer of Michelle’s plan.  It was used through the glabellar (frown) region, around the lateral eye area and within selected platysmal bands of the neck. 

In the upper face, the purpose was to soften lines created by the change in muscle dynamics that occur with volume loss and gravity, as well as repeated contraction over the years.  The aim is to reduce a tense or tired appearance.  A tailored toxin treatment should preserve expression, brow character and the natural animation of the eyes.  Dose and placement are adjusted to the patient’s individual muscular pattern, proportions and baseline movement.  Current consensus guidance favours this personalised form of neuromodulation, using dynamic assessment and precise targeting.

The platysma is a broad superficial muscle extending from the upper chest into the lower face.  Its pull can contribute to vertical neck bands and reduce jawline clarity.  Carefully treating selected fibres can lessen this downward traction and complement the support created with filler.

For Michelle, filler improved the lower-face framework and toxins reduced muscular forces acting against that definition.  This created a more balanced setting for the subsequent light and laser treatments.

 

Step Three: IPL for Sun Damage, Lentigines and Redness

 

Structural treatments can be beautifully executed and still look incomplete when the skin carries significant photodamage.  Michelle had lentigines near the ear, scattered facial hyperpigmentation and areas of redness, including around the nose. As a result, Lumecca IPL  was chosen to improve these colour irregularities.

IPL uses controlled pulses of broad-spectrum light.  Selected wavelengths are absorbed by melanin in brown pigmentation and haemoglobin in superficial vessels.  This makes it useful for treating any red or brown discolouration in the skin, in the form of sun spots, diffuse redness and uneven tone across a wider facial area.  In practical terms, IPL often makes the complexion look clearer and more uniform.  Even colour reflects light more evenly, creating a significant rejuvenating effect.

The ongoing use of daily broad-spectrum SPF is central after IPL. Treated pigment may temporarily darken before shedding and ultraviolet protection helps prevent new photodamage from accumulating.

 

Step Four: UltraClear Laser for Laxity, Texture and Collagen

 

Michelle’s final major treatment layer was UltraClear, a fractional laser used for resurfacing, collagen remodelling and skin tightening.  Her treatment covered the face, with more intensive work through the submental area, lateral lower face and jowls, plus a gentler approach around the lower eyelids.

Fractional laser creates controlled microscopic treatment zones surrounded by intact tissue that supports healing.  UltraClear can be adjusted by depth, density and mode, allowing different parts of the face to receive treatment suited to their anatomy.  Delicate skin around the eyes requires a lighter approach whereas more established laxity around the lower face and beneath the chin may benefit from deeper remodelling.

Each preceding treatment had already addressed another layer.  Filler restored structural support, toxins adjusted muscular pull and IPL targeted colour.  UltraClear worked on the strength, texture and organisation of the skin itself, encouraging epidermal renewal and dermal collagen remodelling.

Peer-reviewed research on the 2910 nm UltraClear platform has reported improvements in advanced facial and neck photoageing, including wrinkles and overall skin quality, with high satisfaction.  Broader reviews of fractional laser technology support its use for fine lines, textural irregularity, pigmentation and features of photodamage.

UltraClear results develop progressively.  Surface changes emerge after healing, and collagen remodelling continues  over 6-9 months post treatment.  This gradual evolution suits natural facial rejuvenation because the face appears increasingly refreshed as tissue quality improves.

How the Treatments Worked Together

 

Michelle’s programme can be understood as four linked corrections. Deep Plane Filler rebuilt structural support through the midface, chin and jaw.  Botulinum toxin injections softened expression lines and reduced platysmal pull. IPL improved brown pigment and redness.  UltraClear strengthened and resurfaced the skin, with targeted work around the lower face, jawline and eyes.

Every modality had a defined biological role and a layer of action in the face.

 

What to Look for in Michelle’s Before-and-After Photographs

 

Natural full-face rejuvenation is best assessed beyond individual creasees.  In Michelle’s accompanying photographs, useful points of comparison include the transition between the lower eyelid and midface, definition at the mandibular angles, central chin support, the contour beneath the jaw and the uniformity of the complexion.

Expression should remain recognisable and the patient should still look like themselves.  Facial proportions should feel familiar and the skin should reflect light more evenly.  A successful result often registers as healthy, rested and coherent rather than registering as looking ‘treated’.

Natural Facial Rejuvenation in Your 50s

 

Patients in their 50s often benefit from multi-layered treatment programmes because structural volume loss, photodamage and collagen depletion may all be present and amenable to non-surgical options, regardless of age and stage in life.

Natural looking results means accurate and well planned treatments. Michelle required a comprehensive programme because her concerns involved the whole face and several tissue levels.  The aesthetic intention remained conservative, with every intervention chosen to restore balance, improve skin health and preserve the features that made her recognisably herself.

Ageing continues, so maintenance becomes part of the strategy.  Sensible review, daily SPF, evidence-based skincare with antioxidants and retinoids and occasional treatment maintenance can support the results over time.  The aim is a long-term relationship with the face, guided by anatomy and tissue health.

 

Frequently Asked Questions About Full-Face Rejuvenation

 

Can toxins, dermal filler, IPL and UltraClear be combined?

These treatments can form part of the same programme when they are properly assessed, sequenced and delivered by experienced medical practitioners.  Timing is personalised according to the areas treated, skin response, recovery and clinical priorities.

 

Is Deep Plane Filler suitable for facial ageing in the 50s?

Deep structural filler can be useful when ageing has reduced support through bony volume loss. Suitability depends on anatomy, previous treatment, tissue quality and the degree of laxity and tissue descent.  Some patients may gain more from skin tightening or surgical assessment.

 

How long do UltraClear laser results take to appear?

Initial improvements in texture and clarity develop after healing.  Collagen remodelling continues over several months, so tightening and dermal improvements may become more apparent with time.  The number and intensity of sessions depend on photoageing, laxity and desired downtime so we always recommend a personalised programme based on clinical assessment.

 

A Considered Plan, Built Around the Patient

Michelle’s treatment illustrates the central philosophy of our clinics.  We begin with the person, study the anatomy and build a plan across the layers that genuinely need attention.  Every syringe, injection point and laser pass must earn its place.

Full-face rejuvenation is at its most convincing when structure, movement, colour and skin quality improve together.  The result should retain biography, expression and character.  Michelle still looks like Michelle, with stronger support, clearer skin and a face that sits more comfortably in its own architecture.

Individual outcomes and recovery vary. All aesthetic procedures require a medical consultation, assessment of suitability and discussion of potential risks, benefits and alternatives.  To book in for a consultation with one of our expert clinicians, click here.

 

References

 

Braccini, F., Catoni, I., Belfkira, F. et al. (2023) ‘SAMCEP Society consensus on the treatment of upper facial lines with botulinum neurotoxin type A: A tailored approach’, Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology, 22(10), pp. 2692–2704. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocd.15768 [Accessed 26th July 2026]

 

Haykal, D., Cartier, H., Goldberg, D.J. and Gold, M.H. (2024) ‘Advancements in laser technologies for skin rejuvenation: A comprehensive review of efficacy and safety’, Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology, 23(10), pp. 3078–3089. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocd.16514 [Accessed 26th July 2026]

 

Murray, T.N., Hu, J.K., Friedman, P.M. and Hu, J. (2024) ‘Full-face and neck resurfacing with a novel ablative fractional 2910 nm erbium-doped fluoride glass fiber laser for advanced photoaging’, Lasers in Surgery and Medicine, 56(3), pp. 249–256. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1002/lsm.23764 [Accessed 26th July 2026]

 

Sales, A.F.S., Pandolfo, I.L., de Almeida Cruz, M. et al. (2022) ‘Intense Pulsed Light on skin rejuvenation: A systematic review’, Archives of Dermatological Research, 314(9), pp. 823–838. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00403-021-02283-2 [Accessed 26th July 2026]

 

Sundaram, H., Liew, S., Signorini, M., Vieira Braz, A., Fagien, S., Swift, A., De Boulle, K.L., Raspaldo, H., Trindade de Almeida, A.R. and Monheit, G. (2016) ‘Global Aesthetics Consensus: Hyaluronic Acid Fillers and Botulinum Toxin Type A: Recommendations for combined treatment and optimizing outcomes in diverse patient populations’, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 137(5), pp. 1410–1423. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000002119 [Accessed 26th July 2026]

 

Wang, X., Wu, Y., Li, B., Mu, X. and Li, L. (2022) ‘Lifting the midface using a hyaluronic acid filler with lidocaine: A randomized multi-center study in a Chinese population’, Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology, 21(12), pp. 6710–6716. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocd.15286 [Accessed 26th July 2026]